Biological poverty: Difference between revisions

From Devec
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
English scholar {{w|Thomas Robert Malthus}} supported basically an eternal misery law of biological poverty, basically concluding that whatever human progress is made in producing more food and other goods will always give a matching increase in population, so holding poverty steady always. According to Malthus, if food production is steady then population will be steady - though progress may tend to increase food production and give a matching growth in population that holds poverty steady.<ref>{{cite web|title=World Poverty,|url=http://world-poverty.org/economicpoverty.htm|website=world-poverty.org|accessdate=15 May 2018}}</ref>
[https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=0hjvCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA48&lpg=PA48&dq=%22biological+poverty%22&source=bl&ots=p3lR2wrC92&sig=FSV1ynTYa0y5Hm5NSE6_8X9I6EY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjniJPDvoTbAhUIkpAKHacVC0EQ6AEIczAO#v=onepage&q=%22biological%20poverty%22&f=false],[http://world-poverty.org/economicpoverty.htm], [https://www.majortests.com/essay/Sociology-Mid-Term-590483.html], [https://spark.adobe.com/page/DcaIOrtuvtxxG/], [https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=0hjvCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA48&lpg=PA48&dq=%22biological+poverty+%22&source=bl&ots=p3lR2wszb3&sig=Ng0GgyPPQdejR_sDjtvw50c0XDQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi2gJKbwYTbAhWGQpAKHfDHADcQ6AEIczAO#v=onepage&q=%22biological%20poverty%20%22&f=false], [http://www.szociologia.hu/dynamic/RevSoc_2001_2_MitevPE_Dimnamics_of_poverty_.pdf]
[https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=0hjvCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA48&lpg=PA48&dq=%22biological+poverty%22&source=bl&ots=p3lR2wrC92&sig=FSV1ynTYa0y5Hm5NSE6_8X9I6EY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjniJPDvoTbAhUIkpAKHacVC0EQ6AEIczAO#v=onepage&q=%22biological%20poverty%22&f=false],[http://world-poverty.org/economicpoverty.htm], [https://www.majortests.com/essay/Sociology-Mid-Term-590483.html], [https://spark.adobe.com/page/DcaIOrtuvtxxG/], [https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=0hjvCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA48&lpg=PA48&dq=%22biological+poverty+%22&source=bl&ots=p3lR2wszb3&sig=Ng0GgyPPQdejR_sDjtvw50c0XDQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi2gJKbwYTbAhWGQpAKHfDHADcQ6AEIczAO#v=onepage&q=%22biological%20poverty%20%22&f=false], [http://www.szociologia.hu/dynamic/RevSoc_2001_2_MitevPE_Dimnamics_of_poverty_.pdf]

Revision as of 02:42, 15 May 2018

English scholar Thomas Robert Malthus supported basically an eternal misery law of biological poverty, basically concluding that whatever human progress is made in producing more food and other goods will always give a matching increase in population, so holding poverty steady always. According to Malthus, if food production is steady then population will be steady - though progress may tend to increase food production and give a matching growth in population that holds poverty steady.[1]


[1],[2], [3], [4], [5], [6]

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".