Mill's paradox: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"The richest countries, caeteris paribus, gain the least by a given amount of foreign commerce: since, having a greater demand for commodities generally, they are likely to have a greater demand for foreign commodities, and thus modify the terms of interchange to their own disadvantage".<ref>{{cite book|last1=Dimand|first1=Robert W.|title=The Origins of International Economics: Classical theory of the gains from trade|url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=NDPTeqMn9hwC&pg=PA489&lpg=PA489&dq=%22mill%27s+paradox%22&source=bl&ots=3k-gf0fJew&sig=V3QtQz2RQ_C9FATv6IdhBsnnTNM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjJkoPA1fbaAhWDEpAKHSvSArIQ6AEINDAD#v=onepage&q=%22mill's%20paradox%22&f=false}}</ref> | The term was coined by Edgeworth (1899).<ref>{{cite book|last1=Maneschi|first1=Andrea|title=Comparative Advantage in International Trade: A Historical Perspective|url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=Vu_igwzgYzoC&pg=PA118&lpg=PA118&dq=%22mill%27s+paradox%22&source=bl&ots=oXBMwrCV5U&sig=jPyT20YtNPNleqBwf-M6jwRMthc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjHw7-A2PbaAhVEhpAKHTYGAPkQ6AEINzAE#v=onepage&q=%22mill's%20paradox%22&f=false}}</ref> In Mill's words, "The richest countries, ''caeteris paribus'', gain the least by a given amount of foreign commerce: since, having a greater demand for commodities generally, they are likely to have a greater demand for foreign commodities, and thus modify the terms of interchange to their own disadvantage".<ref>{{cite book|last1=Dimand|first1=Robert W.|title=The Origins of International Economics: Classical theory of the gains from trade|url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=NDPTeqMn9hwC&pg=PA489&lpg=PA489&dq=%22mill%27s+paradox%22&source=bl&ots=3k-gf0fJew&sig=V3QtQz2RQ_C9FATv6IdhBsnnTNM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjJkoPA1fbaAhWDEpAKHSvSArIQ6AEINDAD#v=onepage&q=%22mill's%20paradox%22&f=false}}</ref> | ||
Argentine economist José Luis Espert uses Mill's paradox to explain why openness to free market among two countries, tend to favor the smallest country.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Espert|first1=José Luis|title=La Argentina Devorada|page=185}}</ref> | Argentine economist José Luis Espert uses Mill's paradox to explain why openness to free market among two countries, tend to favor the smallest country.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Espert|first1=José Luis|title=La Argentina Devorada|page=185}}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 17:59, 8 May 2018
The term was coined by Edgeworth (1899).[1] In Mill's words, "The richest countries, caeteris paribus, gain the least by a given amount of foreign commerce: since, having a greater demand for commodities generally, they are likely to have a greater demand for foreign commodities, and thus modify the terms of interchange to their own disadvantage".[2]
Argentine economist José Luis Espert uses Mill's paradox to explain why openness to free market among two countries, tend to favor the smallest country.[3]